|
|
Posted By Kristen Seward, Ph.D.,
Thursday, April 3, 2025
Updated: Friday, March 21, 2025
|
I love to create curriculum for gifted students! Everywhere I go and everywhere I look, I always see things through the eyes of a middle and high school English teacher: “How can I use this interesting ‘thing’ I found in a museum gift shop in my classroom?” “Oh, the quotation on that poster relates to a novel my students are reading, and I can use it as a writing prompt!” I’ve even used a classroom poster on punctuation marks that I found at a Goodwill Store as the basis for a presentation to parents about youth with gifts, creativity, and talents! For example, how are your gifted children like exclamation points (intensities, sensitivities, overexcitabilities) and question marks (curiosity, divergent thinking, multipotentiality that complicates college and career decision-making)? I’d use these questions and parents’ responses to identify and discuss common intellectual, social, and emotional characteristics of gifted students.
In addition to museum gift shops and Goodwill Stores, teachers now have another interesting, more powerful resource to assist with curriculum development—artificial intelligence (AI). By leveraging AI's capabilities in data-driven instruction, personalizing content, utilizing educational materials in new ways, and refining teaching strategies through targeted professional development, teachers can significantly enhance teaching and learning to meet the unique needs of gifted learners.
The use of educational technology by teachers and students is not new, of course, but the possibilities afforded by AI have brought the use of technology for educational purposes to the forefront. Twenty-five years ago, Bransford et al. (2004) identified five applications of educational technology that are still relevant and with AI, more practicable today: 1) relating content to real-world problems; 2) using multimedia tools to enhance learning; 3) providing additional avenues for student-teacher communication; 4) supporting global engagement; and 5) offering new forms of professional development for teachers. AI-driven tools can help teachers develop dynamic curricular content that adapts to different learning styles and paces. This flexibility is essential for gifted students who often learn at an accelerated rate and require more complex material than their peers (VanTassel‐Baska, 2018). For example, intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) can provide personalized support and feedback, helping gifted students navigate challenging subjects while freeing teachers to focus on delivering educational value and fostering a rich learning environment (Aubeuf, 2023).
Jump ahead to 2013, Chen et al.’s Enable, Enhance, and Transform Framework provided a comprehensive strategy to “systematically conceptualize, incorporate, and utilize technology in gifted education” (p. 166). Specifically, AI enables teachers and gifted learners to access more and more diverse ways of knowing and doing, including communicating with like-minded peers across the world; enhances teaching and learning with its ability to analyze gifted students’ data, to identify their learning patterns and preferences, and to create personalized learning experiences tailored to students’ learning strengths and weaknesses; and transforms the quality of teachers’ and students’ experiences in gifted programming by designing learning environments that incorporate academic acceleration and enrichment. For instance, AI-driven platforms can assess students' progress and adapt content in real-time to ensure that concepts are both challenging and engaging, thus promoting higher-order thinking skills, which are particularly crucial for gifted learners (Bright & Calvert, 2023; Cheung et al., 2020; Miedijensky, 2018).
Let’s jump ahead again to Siegle’s (2024) application of AI in three key elements of curriculum for gifted students: acceleration, depth and complexity, and interest-based content. We know that effective gifted programming is founded on high-quality curriculum that challenges gifted students intellectually and provides opportunities to them to explore their interests and passions (Sutherland & Reid, 2023), and AI can enhance curriculum by offering recommendations on advanced topics and resources suited to individual interests and talent areas, thereby fostering motivation and deeper engagement (Neal, 2025).
Another powerful application of AI is to aid teachers in collaborative data-based decision-making and professional development in gifted education. By aggregating data on student performance and preferences, AI systems can enhance communication among administrators, teachers, students, and parents to facilitate informed decisions regarding resource allocation and academic interventions before issues arise, thereby ensuring that educational needs are proactively met (Yu, 2023). In addition, many educators express a lack of confidence in teaching gifted students effectively and express their need for training. AI can support these efforts by identifying specific training needs based on teacher-provided data regarding student achievement, affective needs, classroom behavior, and engagement, thus guiding teachers to pursue relevant, targeted professional development opportunities (McCormick & Guilbault, 2023).
Serendipitously, the April 2025 issue of Gifted Child Today contains two interesting articles related to this topic. Guilbault et al. (2025) explore ChatGPT's application in addressing high school gifted learners' academic and social-emotional needs, emphasizing how to create effective prompts, to enhance critical thinking, to incorporate virtual mentorships, and to support reflective learning. Rubenstein et al.’s (2025) Journeying between Worlds and Words lesson explored using ChatGPT with third and fourth graders to create customized play scripts, enhancing students’ engagement, creative processes, and reading fluency and empowering them as active creators of learning experiences rather than passive consumers. These recent articles provide solid examples about how teachers can use the power of AI to positively affect students’ learning experiences for increased achievement and meaningful engagement.
I hope I’ve convinced you to give AI a try in one or more of the ways described above. AI's transformative potential in gifted education is marked by its capability to personalize learning, create adaptive curricula, and facilitate teacher development. Through effective utilization of AI technologies, educators can significantly enhance the educational experiences of gifted learners, ensuring that their distinct needs are met and their potentials fully realized.
If you want or need to learn more, why not create your own professional development plan using AI-powered tools? Professional Development for Teachers in the Age of AI (Cukurova, 2024) is an excellent resource for this purpose, including example prompts teachers may use when seeking professional development on a specific topic. If you have time, come back to the blog to let us know how it goes!
References
Aubeuf, C. (2023). Uses of artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems. In Mafalda Carmo (Ed.), Education Applications & Development VIII (pp. 304-312), Advances in Education and Educational Trends Series. inScience Press. https://doi.org/10.36315/2023eadviii25
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2004). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy of Sciences. https://www.csun.edu/~SB4310/How%20People%20Learn.pdf
Bright, S. and Calvert, E. (2023). Educational technology: Barrier or bridge to equitable access to advanced learning opportunities? Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168711
Chen, J., Dai, D. Y., & Zhou, Y. (2013) Enable, enhance, and transform: How technology use can improve gifted education, Roeper Review, 35(3), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.794892
Cheung, R., Hui, A., & Cheung, A. (2020). Gifted education in Hong Kong: A school-based support program catering to learner diversity. Ecnu Review of Education, 3(4), 632-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120967447
Cukurova, M., Kralj, L., Hertz, B. & Saltidou, E. (2024). Professional Development for Teachers in the Age of AI. European Schoolnet. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10186881/1/EUNA-Thematic-Seminar-Report-V5%20%281%29.pdf
Guilbault, K. M., Wang, Y., & McCormick, K. M. (2025). Using ChatGPT in the secondary gifted classroom for personalized learning and mentoring. Gifted Child Today, 48(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241308950
McCormick, K. and Guilbault, K. (2023). Thriving amidst the pandemic: Teaching gifted students online and the role of adaptation and innovation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 35(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x231220052
Miedijensky, S. (2018). Learning environment for the gifted—what do outstanding teachers of the gifted think? Gifted Education International, 34(3), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429417754204
Neal, T. M. (2025). Creating academically advanced learning environments for gifted students through artificial intelligence. In A. G. Walters (Ed.), Transforming Special Education Through Artificial Intelligence (pp. 165-192). IGI Global. https://www.doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5538-1.ch006
Rubenstein, L., Waldron, A., & Ramirez, G. (2025). Transforming worlds into words: Using ChatGPT to bring student visions to life. Gifted Child Today, 48(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241308951
Siegle D. (2024). Using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to support the three legs of talent development. Gifted Child Today, 47(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241242495
Sutherland, M. and Reid, C. (2023). A small country with big ambitions: does this include the gifted? Education Sciences, 13(8), 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080832
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2018). Considerations in curriculum for gifted students. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 349–369). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-023
Yu, P. (2023). The future prospects of deep learning and neural networks: Artificial intelligence's impact on education. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Automation. https://www.doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/33/20230239
Tags:
Curriculum Studies
Network
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Jennifer C. Fisher, Ph.D.,
Thursday, March 6, 2025
Updated: Tuesday, March 4, 2025
|
As an Arts Network, we are always looking for ways to celebrate the gifted young artists we serve. Each discipline approaches this slightly differently. For example, music educators are well acquainted with the tradition of having their students participate in honor bands, choirs, or orchestras at local, state, national, and even international levels. These honors ensembles are often comprised of the most gifted musicians within a given geographic area, and the students typically participate in a one-day, intensive training session with a guest conductor or clinician who prepares them for a concert in the evening. This setup allows students from a variety of educational backgrounds and schools to participate in a cooperative learning experience, as they practice and perform advanced and complex musical pieces within an accelerated time frame.
While this is a strong tradition within music education (one in which I participated as a student, no less), it is substantially less common in the world of visual art where I currently live and work. Several years ago, a music education colleague of mine at my university approached me with an idea to turn his annual “music festival” into a true “fine arts festival”. As he and I discussed music education’s approach to these one-day, intensive, accelerated learning experiences for gifted young musicians, we considered multiple options for how we might go about creating such a thing to include the visual arts.
It is important to note that the music festival from which we began is specifically catered toward providing an opportunity for students from under-resourced schools with a chance to meet their advanced learning needs. Schools that are a part of the Des Lee Fine Arts Collaborative qualify for Title I funding, and most are located in areas throughout Greater St. Louis that experience high levels of poverty. Music educators from these schools nominate their young musicians, and judges assemble full orchestras, bands, and choirs based on teacher recommendations and nominations of eligible students. My colleague and I decided to create a one-day visual arts element to complement the musical element of the festival in a similar way.
Pulling from the same pool of school districts who are part of the Collaborative, visual arts educators at the middle and high school levels are asked to nominate up to 10 of their students who exhibit extraordinary skill and potential in the visual arts. Once the entire list of nominees is compiled, a group of 30 is chosen for both the middle school and high school portions of the festival. Teacher recommendations, school sizes, and space constraints are all considered as a group of diverse artists is selected.
Each year, my colleagues and I endeavor to provide a visual art challenge for participating students that extends their skillsets and pushes them out of potential comfort zones of creation. For example, instead of engaging students in a day-long expression of drawing or painting, in the past several years, students have been tasked with learning to needle felt, create images on windows with tape, and to create elaborate collage work. It is important for the work to be something that can realistically be completed within one day (in approximately 6 hours), and we work to expose students to art making media that they may not typically be able to access at their own schools.
At the end of the evening, students set up their artworks in a gallery setting outside the music hall, and their loved ones are welcome to attend their “gallery opening”. Families and friends of the musicians often mix and mingle among their artwork before the music hall opens for the evening’s concert, giving the students an opportunity to experience a taste of the life of a working artist. We believe this is important as the students begin to envision themselves as serious artists, worthy of consideration as emerging professionals. Students mount their work and create labels that include their names, schools, and the titles of their artworks.
Lastly, while one music group is exiting the stage and another is ascending behind the curtain during the concert, we show a brief video of all the things the visual arts students did throughout the day. We show images of the students grouped with their teachers and classmates by school, then pictures of the creation process, followed by photos of their finished artworks. Lastly, we announce the Honorable Mentions and Best of Show awards.
One-day festivals like the one I describe here are not the solution to an educational system that often fails to meet the needs of high ability visual artists overall. However, they are one small step toward envisioning a world where gifted young artists from every potential demographic area are given an opportunity to learn according to their abilities and skillsets. For a full description of this festival, please refer to the article below that I published with my friend and colleague in music education. For additional information, please feel free to peruse the website listed below or contact me at fisherjc@umsl.edu.
https://desleefinearts.org/collaborative-activities/des-lee-middle-school-and-high-school-fine-arts-festivals/
Fisher, J. & Smith, M. V., (2021) “Establishing Fine Arts Festivals as Equitable Learning Opportunities for High Ability Visual Artists”, Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education 38(1), 160-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.2458/jcrae.4802
Tags:
Arts
Network
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By S. Nikki Myers, M.A.,
Thursday, March 6, 2025
Updated: Wednesday, March 5, 2025
|
To say that there is a lot going on in the world at the moment is such a dramatic understatement. This week, the last of February 2025, I was on a video call with members of the Global Awareness Network in NAGC, and colleagues from California, Washington, Colorado, Nevada, Jamaica, and New Zealand. Annemarie Roeper, a force of nature and an advocate for the ethical development of gifted children, among other child-centered goals (Silverman, 2001), instigated the launch of the Global Awareness Network (Delisle, 2012) as a way to connect and inspire across gifted education. I asked this international group, including those who knew her well, how things are going in their parts of this world.
One colleague shared that her professional, paid K12 educational work is fully government-grant funded which has created nervousness, limits on the types of communication they can use, and discussions across the state concerning what resources feel safe to share with families, or not. In contrast, the nonprofit organization on the volunteer side of her life has almost finalized a published statement of solidarity, sensitivity, and compassion for intersectional groups of gifted learners, such as families with giftedness and immigrant status, or other areas mentioned by recent federal orders. They want to develop and publish the words that say, in a meaningful way, You are seen. You belong.
Another colleague shared what came to mind: the epidemic of loneliness highlighted by the former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy. In an interview last year (Tamron Hall Show, 2024), he compared the physical and mental health impacts of loneliness and isolation (Selz, 2023) to smoking fifteen cigarettes a day. On a recent, January 7, 2025 Bit of Optimism podcast (Simon Sinek, 2025), Dr. Murthy discusses where do we go to feel like we belong? My colleague thinks about this topic in her daily work with students, as she seeks and finds ways to help them connect, support, and encourage each other.
Dr. Rosemary Cathcart, from her place on our video call all the way from New Zealand, was urged by Dr. Linda Silverman to discuss the resources that she has written on the ethical development of children. From Rosemary’s book, They’re Not Bringing My Brain Out, in chapter 27: “Gifted children in particular tend to have a strong concern with justice but may feel overwhelmed by a sense of the impotence of the individual. Providing some framework to help them develop a belief in the capacity of the individual to make a difference is a critical element in their growth as effective individuals, ultimately with a strong life vision (Cathcart, 2020).” In that chapter, Rosemary discussed the conversations that can happen from home and school collaboration to develop students’ awareness of how values are developed, to understand other people’s ways of gaining knowledge, and to use emotional sensitivity and perceptiveness. She recommends finding issues that are important to children, at their level, to use as teachable moments. She also suggests locating opportunities in the curriculum for discussing the behaviors, actions, and choices that people make. Programs such as Future Problem Solving, Philosophy for Children, and methods such as the Socratic technique (Miller, 2021) with secondary students and also with young students (Gregor, 2019), can build these thinking skills. Rosemary gave multiple, practical examples of this thoughtful, real work with students in the book, and shared on the call how the work continues.
Linda helped us wrap up the conversation as she mentioned work for an upcoming issue of Advanced Development: A Journal on Adult Giftedness, and also shared highlights from the Global Awareness Network Meeting at the 2024 annual conference in Seattle. “Annamarie was a force, and if she said we need this, I would say ‘okay, how do we do it?’… She dreamed of an organization that would care about the ethical development of the gifted. She had her SAI model (Self Actualization Interdependence Model)(Roeper, 1997; Roeper School, 2025), which was all about, Who are you? Not, what can you do? It’s about your own evolution as a human being, not how you can fulfill my expectations of you. She brought that energy to NAGC… and now it feels like yes, there are people interested, and we can go forward… Annemarie’s original vision was to have an organization that was a part of all of the organizations for the gifted… we’re entering a new era where collaboration and cooperation and ethics are important, and I think this is the time to revisit and rediscover Annemarie’s work (Silverman, 2024, personal presentation).”
From the Global Awareness Network, we hope that where you are, you feel that you belong, that you matter, and that your work for students and with students matters. Here is to the role of ethical development, compassion, and connection in our field of gifted education.
References
Cathcart, R. (2020). They’re Not Bringing My Brain Out: Understanding and Working with Gifted and Talented Learners (4th ed.). Hachette New Zealand.
Delisle, J. (2012). Annemarie Roeper: The voice of gifted children. Roeper Review, 34(4), 209–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.715331
Gregor. (2019, February 11). Socratic teaching for kindergarteners? Can you even do that? Scholé Academy.
https://scholeacademy.com/socratic-teaching-for-kindergarteners-can-you-even-do-that/
Miller, R. (2021). Using the Socratic Method In Your Classroom. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-socratic-method-your-classroom/
Roeper, A. (1997). Listen to the gifted child.,. Roeper Review, 19(3), 166–167. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ549028
Roeper School. (2025). Early Educational Philosophy. The Roeper School. https://www.roeper.org/list-detail?pk=93120
Selz, A. (2023, May 2). Loneliness poses health risks as deadly as smoking, U.S. surgeon general says. PBS News. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/loneliness-poses-health-risks-as-deadly-as-smoking-u-s-surgeon-general-says
Silverman, L. K. (2001). This issue honors Annemarie Roeper—A gifted teacher and teacher of the gifted. Roeper Review, 23(4), 188. https://www.proquest.com/docview/206697121/abstract/40BFCACB81054619PQ/1
Simon Sinek (Director). (2025, January 7). The Cure for Loneliness with U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy | A Bit of Optimism Podcast [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xsueRaWSa8
Tamron Hall Show (Director). (2024, January 10). The Surgeon General’s Stern Warning About the Loneliness Epidemic [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q77HJgVSCfc
Tags:
Global Awareness
Network
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By John Segota, MPS, CAE, Executive Director,
Monday, March 3, 2025
|
NAGC Public Policy Update - March 2025
Additional Cuts to Teacher Programs Announced
The U.S. Department of Education (ED) announced additional cuts in February to federally funded grants for programs that help states recruit, train, and support K-12 classroom teachers. Among the cancellations were over $600 million in grants through the Teacher Quality Partnerships (TQP) program, which is funded by Congress to support preparation of profession-ready teachers for high-need schools and high-need subject areas. TQP funds partnerships between institutions of higher education and high-need schools and districts to “develop master’s-level residency programs or to reform undergraduate preservice preparation programs.” Also cut were contracts under the congressionally funded Supporting Effective Educator Development (SEED) program, which is meant to increase the number of highly effective educators by supporting “the implementation of evidence-based practices that prepare, develop, or enhance the skills of educators.” ED also canceled $226 million in grants for the Comprehensive Centers Program (CCP), which is funded to provide capacity-building services to State educational agencies, regional educational agencies, local educational agencies, and schools that improve educational opportunities and outcomes, close achievement gaps, and improve the quality of instruction for all students, particularly for groups of students with the greatest need.
To read about the TQP, SEED, and CCP, visit their respective pages here.
To read media coverage of the cuts go here.
ED Adjusts Review Process for Federally Funded Charter School Program
The U.S. Department of Education (ED) announced that they will eliminate a Biden-era requirement that ED play a role in oversight of state authorizing decisions regarding the Charter School Program (CSP). The decision reverts the function of ED back to the original statutory authority from 2013, whereby ED plays a very limited role in the oversight of charter school authorizers (which states legislate and give to universities and other entities). The CSP is authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, currently known as the Every Student Succeeds Act, and is currently funded by Congress at $440 M. The program provides funds to help state-authorized charter schools find suitable facilities, reward high-quality charter schools that form exemplary collaborations with traditional public schools, and invest in other national initiatives that support public charter schools.
ED Instructs Schools to End Racial Preferences
On February 14, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) issued a Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) advising educational institutions receiving federal funds to cease using race as a factor in admissions, hiring, promotions, compensation, scholarships, discipline, and related areas. The DCL targets programs that promote or support diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and notes letter “does not have the force and effect of law and does not bind the public or create new legal standards,” yet warns educational institutions that “…noncompliance could result in investigations and loss of federal funding, with enforcement beginning within 14 days.” In direct response, lawyers who study and teach antidiscrimination law, education law, employment law, constitutional law, and civil rights have issued a joint public letter expressing “concern” that federally funded institutions will “eliminate, or already have eliminated, important DEI initiatives that remain legally defensible and often further institutions’ legal obligations under federal laws. They summarize by noting. “…under prevailing federal civil rights laws and Supreme Court precedent, DEI initiatives that do not employ racial classifications or otherwise limit opportunity to individuals from certain racial groups remain legally secure…[and] urge(s) university leaders not to sacrifice essential and legally defensible DEI initiatives.”
Read the Dear Colleague Letter here.
Read the public response letter here.
Senate Committee Holds McMahon Confirmation Hearing
On February 13, the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee held a hearing to consider the nomination of Linda McMahon to be Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education (ED). In her opening remarks, McMahon pledged to deliver on education-related campaign promises, including focusing on parents and limiting the federal role in education. A question-and-answer session began with HELP Committee Chair Bill Cassidy (R-LA), who asked about early diagnosis of dyslexia, whereby McMahon committed to working with the Chair on his priority. Among many questions related to the Trump campaign promise to shutter ED, Senator Collins (R-ME) asked how oversight and administration of education programs would continue under a reorganization or closure of the Department. McMahon remarked that she would examine whether laws such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) “might be better served” in other agencies. The plan for other laws was less transparent, and McMahon did offer that ED cannot be eliminated without an act of Congress. Sen. Hassan (D-NH) spent much of her time focused on IDEA, stating, “It takes national commitment to get it [implementing IDEA] done. And that is why so many people are so concerned about this proposal to eliminate the Department. Because they think kids will once again be shoved aside, especially kids with disabilities." Follow-up questions noted the terminations this week of ED employees whose statuses were provisional. McMahon replied that she is not yet privy to personnel practices at ED. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) raised the issue of private school choice and the impact of such models in rural areas with only one school. She asked McMahon what her commitment is to public schools, and the reply was, “Public schools are the bedrock of our society.” In regard to a recent Executive Order on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) asked how a school knows whether it is running a “DEI” program and noted that the confusion around the definition has resulted in the Department of Defense schools halting Black History Month activities. An area of agreement across the aisle and with the nominee revolved around a shared commitment to promoting and supporting career and technical education that leads to employment. The Committee approved McMahon’s nomination on February 20, and the full Senate is expected to vote on her confirmation on March 3.
To view the hearing or download McMahon’s statement, go here.
Administration Cuts Education Research and Technical Assistant Contracts
On February 13, the Administration canceled $900 million in contracts for the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), a major U.S. Education Department (ED) agency responsible for funding education research and maintaining extensive education statistics. Among the eighty-nine canceled contracts are research initiatives that include long-term studies on student learning and research on teaching strategies and support for transition [to career training and college] for youth with disabilities. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP: “the nation’s report card") and the College Scorecard will not be affected, according to the Department. On Friday, ED also announced the additional cancellation of over $350 million in contracts and grants for several Regional Educational Laboratories (REL) and the Equity Assistance Centers (EAC). This includes terminating ten contracts worth $336 million with the RELS, which were intended to support applied research, development, and TA. According to an ED press release, a “review of the contracts uncovered wasteful and ideologically driven spending not in the interest of students and taxpayers.” Further clarification explains, “[the] Department intends to establish new contracts that will meet legal requirements, enhance student learning, and better support school districts, State Departments of Education, and other educational stakeholders.”
Read the REL/EAC press release here.
Think Tank Issues FAQ About Functions of ED
The Center for American Progress (CAP) has released a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) brief about the function of the U.S. Department of Education (ED). Succinctly captioned, the brief states that ED enhances education by offering guidance and essential support to states, schools, students, and families nationwide. These federal resources contribute to the agency's goal of ensuring equal educational access for everyone. Continuing this work upholds this federal commitment and guarantees equal opportunities, which in turn bolsters the nation’s economy, democracy, and national security. Specific questions include why ED was established, what it does, what it does not do, whether an executive order can eliminate the Department and whether other countries maintain a national-level education agency. CAP also released a related blog post about the key role ED plays in supporting millions of students with disabilities.
Full-Year Continuing Resolution for FY25 Federal Funding “Likely”
With a March 14 deadline looming large -amidst significant partisan disagreements on top line spending for Fiscal Year 2025 (FY2025) appropriations- Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-ME) announced last week that a full year continuing resolution (CR) “was likely.” President Trump also signaled his support for a funding patch, freeing up Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) to negotiate. While a deal that would run through September 30 seems doable, hardline conservatives are pushing to codify some of the “most egregious” examples of alleged waste found by Elon Musk’s team in recent personnel firings and contract cancellations made across federal agencies. The White House has already floated a list of examples; however, the idea is a hard ‘no’ for Democrats and when pressed about incorporating controversial cuts as part of the deal, Chair Collins said, “I don’t see how that could work.” Both Thune and Johnson have indicated that finalizing a FY2025 deal is the absolute priority next week as President Trump prepares to make his first address as the 47th President to Congress on March 4 at 9:00 PM ET.
Appropriations Committee Holds Hearing on Federal Investment in K-12 Education
On February 26, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies (Labor-H) held a hearing to discuss investments in elementary education. Testimony was heard from Ms. Virginia “Ginny” Gentles of the Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies; Dr. Lindsey Burke, Director of the Center for Education Policy, The Heritage Foundation and author of the education section of Project 2025; Mr. Robert Kim, Executive Director, Education Law Center; and Ms. Starlee Coleman, President and CEO, National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. School choice, student performance, protection of special education funding, and allocation of federal dollars for education emerged as the major topics. The majority party and three of four witnesses advocated sending federal dollars back to the states and shifting oversight responsibility for federally required programs out of the U.S. Department of Education to other agencies. Dr. Burke specifically recommended that funding under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Title I should move to Health and Human Services (HHS), data collection for the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) to the Census Bureau, and Indian Education programs to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Mr. Kim reminded the committee that oversight to ensure all students have free and fair access to public education would be lost if funds were dispersed across agencies.
Watch the hearing and read the testimonies here.
ED Launches ‘End DEI’ Portal
On February 27th, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) launched a portal for parents, students, teachers, and the broader community to report instances of discrimination based on race or gender in publicly funded K-12 schools. The Department will use these community reports to identify potential cases for further investigation.
Read the announcement here.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Kali Fedor, Ed.D. Chair, Public Policy and Advocacy Committee (PPAC),
Friday, February 7, 2025
|
Getting to Know the Work of the Public Policy & Advocacy Committee
As the Chair of NAGC’s Public Policy and Advocacy Committee (PPAC), I’m excited to welcome you to our first blog post. The work of the PPAC is essential to advancing policies that support gifted education, and I look forward to sharing insights on our mission and the impactful initiatives we are leading.
Our Mission
The PPAC collaborates with the NAGC Board and staff to shape the legislative and public policy agenda of the Association. We work tirelessly to ensure gifted education remains a priority in policy discussions at both the state and federal levels. Our committee’s key goals include:
- Providing input into NAGC’s public policy agenda, focusing on state and federal issues impacting gifted education and advanced learning.
- Supporting grassroots advocacy efforts, helping our members and the broader community take action on critical issues.
- Developing advocacy resources, including sample letters, toolkits, and training materials to empower advocates.
- Facilitating partnerships with other organizations, including state affiliates, to amplify our efforts.
Our goal is to create a strong and sustainable advocacy network that supports the needs of gifted learners across the country.
PPAC’s Role in the Leadership and Advocacy Webinar Series
As part of our ongoing commitment to advocacy, the PPAC is excited to support NAGC’s new Leadership and Advocacy Webinar Series. We are proud to be conducting at least three of the webinar sessions, which provide educators and advocates with valuable tools and insights to navigate the landscape of gifted education policy.
The first webinar, launched in December 2024, was titled "Doing Your Homework: Getting Ready for Advocacy in 2025." This session covered essential guidance for individuals looking to influence policies that support gifted learners. The webinar highlighted key strategies for effective advocacy:
- Building Relationships for Advocacy: Effective advocacy starts with cultivating relationships with local, state, and federal officials, including their staff. Connecting with legislative staff, even when legislators are not on education committees, can lead to powerful results. Advocacy requires persistence, clear communication, and relationship-building.
- Defining Your Advocacy Strategy: Successful advocates know their "why" and communicate it with passion. Sharing success stories from gifted education programs and linking these efforts to broader issues like student achievement and teacher retention, can help resonate with policymakers.
- Organizing Advocacy Efforts: Advocates need to understand local and state policies and collaborate with ongoing initiatives to avoid redundant efforts. Crafting clear messages and focusing on key decision-makers is essential for advancing our cause. NAGC’s State of the States in Gifted Education report is an invaluable resource for anyone looking to navigate state-level advocacy.
Advocacy Highlights and Resources
In the webinar, we also highlighted critical federal initiatives such as the Advanced Coursework Equity (ACE) Act, which seeks to expand access to advanced coursework for underrepresented students, and the Javits Program, which provides $16.5 million for research and innovative strategies in gifted education. These programs are key to advancing our goals, and we encourage advocates to engage with these and other initiatives.
We also emphasized the importance of engaging directly with elected officials, whether by phone, video, or in person. Personal meetings with legislators are powerful tools for advocacy, helping to humanize policy issues and build long-term relationships. Additionally, advocacy doesn't stop after the meeting! It is vitally important to follow up with thank-you emails or notes, and staying engaged through grassroots efforts at all levels of government is critical to maintaining momentum.
Looking Ahead
Our work is far from over. As we continue to collaborate with other advocates and build relationships with policymakers, we invite you to join us in advancing gifted education policies. Whether you're new to advocacy or an experienced advocate, there’s a place for you in this effort. We encourage you to stay involved, attend our upcoming webinars, and take action on the resources we provide to make a difference. Additionally, keep your eye out for an email from NAGC around May for volunteer opportunities with committees like the PPAC! We are always in need of more support, knowledge, and expertise from strong advocates like you!
Thank you for being part of the NAGC community. Together, we can create meaningful change for gifted learners across the nation.
Stay tuned for more updates, webinars, and blogs from the PPAC…we are looking forward to collaborating with you on this vital work!
Kali Fedor, Ed.D.
Chair, Public Policy and Advocacy Committee (PPAC)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Michelle Buchanan, PhD, NBCT, U of Central Ark & Monica C. Meadows, Ed.D., U of Ark Little Rock,
Wednesday, February 5, 2025
Updated: Monday, January 27, 2025
|
Gifted students often possess boundless curiosity and immense potential, but unlocking that potential requires more than rigorous academics. Role models play a crucial role in helping gifted learners see themselves in the world and envision the possibilities for their future. In STEM fields, where underrepresentation remains a significant issue, exposure to diverse and inspiring figures can make all the difference.
The Unique Needs of Gifted Learners Gifted students thrive when challenged, inspired, and given a vision of where their abilities can take them. STEM role models do more than showcase career paths—they ignite imaginations, validate interests, and provide a tangible example of success. This is especially critical for gifted students who may feel isolated in their passion for science, technology, engineering, or math. Seeing someone who has walked a similar path can offer both encouragement and direction.
Representation Matters in STEM Role models are most powerful when students can see themselves in them. Unfortunately, many STEM fields still lack diversity, making it harder for underrepresented groups—such as girls, students of color, or those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds—to envision themselves thriving in these careers. Highlighting diverse STEM leaders shows gifted learners that their unique backgrounds, identities, and perspectives are valuable assets in STEM fields.
Examples of Inspiring STEM Role Models
- Historical Figures: Pioneers like Katherine Johnson, a mathematician whose calculations were critical to NASA’s space missions, and Grace Hopper, who developed foundational computer programming concepts, connect the past to the present while demonstrating the power of curiosity and perseverance. Learn more about their contributions through resources like NASA's Katherine Johnson Biography or the Grace Hopper Celebration.
- Modern Innovators: Figures like Dr. Mae Jemison, the first Black woman in space, and Dr. Fei-Fei Li, an AI researcher advancing ethical technology, show how STEM careers impact the world today. Explore Dr. Jemison’s work through The Jemison Group or dive into AI ethics via talks by Dr. Fei-Fei Li available on platforms like TED.
- Unsung Heroes: Engineers, scientists, and innovators like Emily Warren Roebling, who oversaw the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge, Raye Montague who produced the first computer-made Navy warship design, or Dr. Marian Croak, a leader in voice-over-IP technology, reveal that even behind-the-scenes contributions can change the world. Read about these inspiring figures in collections like National Inventors Hall of Fame or profiles on Women’s History.
- Local Heroes: Community professionals—engineers, doctors, tech developers, or environmental scientists—can make STEM careers feel accessible and relatable. They bring STEM to life as students see tangible outcomes of their work. Look into platforms like Meet a Scientist for stories and opportunities to connect with professionals.
How to Introduce STEM Role Models to Gifted Learners
1. Guest Speakers and Mentors: Invite STEM professionals to classrooms, gifted programs, or STEM events to share their experiences and career journeys. Interactive Q&A sessions can spark curiosity and provide practical advice.
2. Books, Documentaries, and Media: Share engaging resources such as biographies (e.g., Hidden Figures by Margot Lee Shetterly), STEM-themed films (Dream Big: Engineering Our World), and podcasts featuring trailblazers.
3. Field Trips and Real-World Exposure: Organize visits to science museums, research labs, tech companies, or engineering firms where students can observe STEM professionals at work.
4. Online Connections: Use platforms like LinkedIn, Nepris, or STEM-specific mentorship programs to connect students with professionals in fields they’re passionate about. Virtual tours and webinars can also provide insight into the day-to-day lives of STEM experts.
5. STEM Resource Websites: Explore websites like Inspiring Girls in STEM, NASA STEM, EngineerGirl, and Code.org for videos, activities, and stories of diverse role models. Additionally, organizations like Black Girls CODE and Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) offer invaluable resources and support specifically for minority students in STEM.
Empowering Students to Be the Next Role Models Gifted learners themselves have the potential to become future STEM leaders and role models. Encouraging them to take on leadership roles in STEM clubs, present their ideas at competitions, or mentor younger students fosters their confidence and prepares them to inspire others. Celebrating their achievements and sharing their stories with peers can further emphasize the importance of role models in STEM.
STEM role models are not just career guides—they are a source of inspiration, motivation, and possibility. By intentionally introducing gifted learners to diverse and relatable figures, we can help them dream bigger, push boundaries, and envision themselves as part of the next generation of innovators and changemakers. After all, today’s gifted students are tomorrow’s STEM heroes. Let’s give them the role models they need to light the way.
Tags:
Network
STEM
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By John Segota, MPS, CAE, Executive Director,
Tuesday, February 4, 2025
Updated: Friday, February 7, 2025
|
It’s a time of change in Washington, DC, with the start of a new administration and a new Congress. To help keep members and the field apprised of the latest developments, NAGC is launching a new blog series that will provide updates on developments impacting gifted and talented education and education policy more broadly.
The start of President Trump’s second term and the new Congress has resulted in tremendous activity in Washington, DC, far more than is typical for the start of a new administration. The volume of Executive Orders signed by the President in his first few weeks in office is unprecedented. The long-term impact of these orders is still being determined, as many of them are being challenged in court. NAGC will continue to monitor developments and analyze them for their impact on gifted and talented students and education. In the meantime, here is a summary of other major developments over the past several weeks related to education policy.
President-Elect Names McMahon as Secretary of Education
In November, then-President-elect Donald J. Trump selected Linda McMahon to head the U.S. Department of Education. Before actively working on his campaign, McMahon chaired the America First Policy Institute, a conservative policy group. American First has provided leadership training, developed staffing strategies, and created policy frameworks for all federal agencies. It also emphasizes the expansion of school choice and micro-schools. A statement regarding her nomination highlighted that "Linda will fight tirelessly to expand ‘choice’ to every State in America, and empower parents to make the best education decisions for their families." McMahon’s previous experience includes heading the U.S. Small Business Administration during Trump’s first term and serving as chief executive of World Wrestling Entertainment. As of January 31, a hearing had not been scheduled to confirm her nomination. In the meantime, the President has named Denise Carter, who was serving as the chief operating officer of the department’s Office of Federal Student Aid, as the acting secretary.
Memo from Trump Administration Temporarily Freezes Federal Funding
A January 27 memo issued to federal agencies by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) instructed the freezing of “all activities related to the obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance… to the extent permissible under current law.” The freeze was intended to give agencies time to ensure compliance with the Executive Orders (EO) issued by President Trump -including the EO issued on January 20 regarding an elimination of funding targeting programs or offices that support diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA). While it is consistent that a new Administration evaluates existing funding agreements to ensure the alignment of priorities, it is unprecedented to halt federal funding in that process. This move resulted in some federal agencies closing funding portals, caused confusion about whether existing federal contracts would be honored, and created a general sense of panic among stakeholders that receive federal funds. By midday Tuesday, a federal judge had issued a ‘stay’ on enforcement of the memo, and by the end of the day, OMB had rescinded the memo itself. However, the underlying directive to evaluate all current funding and ensure its alignment with Executive Orders is still active as agencies evaluate and report to OMB the details of current federal funding obligations.
National Reading and Math Outcomes Released
According to results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) released on January 29 by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Grade 4 math scores improved between 2022 and 2024, a two-point gain that follows a 5-point decline from 2019 to 2022 and eighth-grade scores in math showed no significant change. In reading, scores dropped in both fourth and eighth grades since 2022, continuing declines first reported in 2019. “Overall, achievement has not returned to pre-pandemic performance,” NCES Commissioner Peggy G. Carr said. “Where there are signs of recovery, they are mostly in math, driven by higher-performing students. Lower-performing students are struggling, especially in reading.”
Read the NCES press release here.
Office for Civil Rights Reverts to 2020 Title IX Rule
To support the President’s Defending Women Executive Order (EO), a Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) was issued on January 31 by Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor announcing that effective immediately, the U.S. Department of Education’s (ED) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) will revert to the provisions of 2020 Title IX Rule. Trainor cited the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky decision that vacates the 2024 Title IX Rule, which provided for “gender identity,” a category that runs counter to the EO to acknowledge only two genders —birth assignment as male or female. Because the reversion to the 2020 Title IX Rule subverts requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act -a federal law requiring agencies to follow a "notice-and-comment" rulemaking process when developing or revising regulations, the process to implement the DCL is unclear.
Read the Dear Colleague Letter here.
Guidance Issued to Help States Target Title II Funds in Support of Educators
In December, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) released guidance titled Using Title II, Part A Funds to Strategically Support Educator Recruitment, Retention, Professional Learning, and Improved Student Outcomes. This resource supports state and local planning by outlining how Title II, Part A funds -available to states by formula under the Every Student Succeeds Act- can be used to implement evidence-based policy strategies from the ED’s Raise the Bar: Lead the World initiative that aims to address educator shortages and ensure educators and students have the tools to succeed. Title II, Part A funds may be used, among other purposes, to enhance compensation and improve working conditions, develop, refine, and expand pathways into the teaching profession, support induction programs and ongoing professional development, facilitate educator leadership and career advancement, and advance educator diversity.
Read the guidance here.
President Issues Executive Orders on Education
On January 29, the President issued several Executive Orders specifically focused on education. The first, on “educational freedom,” directs the U.S. Department of Education to take measures to support parental rights and school choice, including issuing guidance on how states can use federal formula funds to support school choice, placing educational freedom as a priority for discretionary grants, and directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to expand choice in block grants to States for family and children services.
Read the EO here.
The second Executive Order, Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling, condemns practices that it defines as fostering division, identity-based victimization, and challenges to family unity. Specifically, the Executive Order focuses on aspects of race and gender and also emphasizes support for patriotic education. Within 90 days, the federal agencies involved must develop strategies to eliminate funding for discriminatory ideologies, protect parental rights, and prevent unauthorized social transitions.
Read the EO here.
Tags:
Membership
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Tyler Clark, EdD,
Monday, February 3, 2025
|
When was the last time you thought about NAGC’s award programs? For many members, the answer might be "not often," especially if you haven’t nominated someone or attended an award presentation. But awards are an important part of how NAGC celebrates excellence, builds community, and recognizes the extraordinary efforts of gifted education professionals, advocates, and students.
Recognizing the importance of this program—and the opportunities to improve and grow—the NAGC Board of Directors convened the Awards Program Task Force (APTF) in early 2024. As chair of the task force, I want to share the story of our work and what it might mean for the future of our awards program.
Why Did the Task Force Form?
The task force was established to take a comprehensive look at the structure and management of NAGC’s awards program. With awards operating at different levels of the organization (organizational awards, network awards, student scholarships, and more), the Board recognized the need for a strategic evaluation. Were we meeting the needs of members? Were the awards aligned with NAGC’s mission? Were there inefficiencies or inconsistencies in how awards were managed? These were the kinds of questions we set out to answer.
What Was Our Charge?
The APTF’s charge was ambitious but essential. We were tasked with evaluating the scope, structure, and administration of the awards program; analyzing policies, guidelines, and funding models; and providing the Board with a menu of options for future improvement. Specifically, we explored:
- How to ensure clarity and consistency for existing and future awards.
- Opportunities to increase member engagement in nominations, volunteer roles, and award ceremonies.
- Ways to streamline the nomination and selection process while maintaining fairness and transparency.
- Options for sustainable funding models.
What Did We Do?
Over the course of several months, our group of dedicated volunteers and staff partners undertook an in-depth review of NAGC’s awards program. Here are some highlights of our activities:
- Data Collection: We reviewed policies, historical nomination data, member demographics, and input from staff and members. We also conducted a survey of network leadership to better understand the structure and administration of network awards.
- Identifying Gaps and Challenges: From policy inconsistencies to the need for more K-12 educator-focused awards, we dug deep into what was and wasn’t working.
- Collaborative Problem-Solving: Through Zoom meetings and robust discussions, we developed a range of options to address the challenges we identified.
- Developing Recommendations: We organized our findings into a series of options for the Board, emphasizing the pros and cons of each to support informed decision-making.
What Did We Find?
At a high level, we discovered both strengths and opportunities for growth within the awards program. Here are a few key takeaways:
- Member Engagement: While the awards program is highly valued, there is significant room to increase member involvement—whether through nominations, volunteering, or attendance at award events.
- Policy Inconsistencies: Organizational and network awards are governed by different policies, which has led to inconsistencies in naming conventions, benefits, and review processes.
- Diversity and Equity: The current award portfolio does not adequately reflect NAGC’s commitment to diversity and equity. For example, these values are only explicitly mentioned in the context of a few student scholarships.
- Committee Capacity: The growing number of nominations has created a significant workload for the Awards Committee. Exploring options like microvolunteer roles or expanding committee size will be essential moving forward.
What’s Next?
Our task force has now completed its work and submitted a final report to the NAGC Board. The report included a thoughtful menu of options to enhance the awards program. These options focus on aligning the program more closely with NAGC’s mission, improving efficiency and equity, and creating meaningful recognition opportunities for members.
The Board will take the next steps in determining the future direction of the awards program. Whatever path they choose, we are confident that it will strengthen the program and its impact on the NAGC community.
A Word of Thanks
I want to extend my heartfelt gratitude to the incredible task force members who brought their expertise, passion, and creativity to this work, as well as to the NAGC staff who supported us every step of the way. This effort was a team endeavor, and it was a privilege to work alongside such dedicated individuals.
To our members, we hope you’ll continue to engage with NAGC’s awards program—by nominating someone, attending a ceremony, or even volunteering to support the process. The program exists to celebrate you and the extraordinary community of gifted education professionals, advocates, and learners.
Stay tuned for updates from the Board about the future of the awards program. In the meantime, if you have ideas or feedback about awards, feel free to reach out to us. Your voice matters, and we’re excited to continue recognizing excellence together.
Tags:
Awards
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Catherine Little, Ph.D., NAGC President-Elect,
Monday, December 16, 2024
Updated: Monday, December 9, 2024
|
NAGC gathered November 21-24 in Seattle, Washington, to wrap up our 70th year with a dynamic and celebratory convention – our first ever in Seattle. More than 2200 people came together to engage in professional learning and community, including over 1000 first-time attendees! The convention included more than 200 sessions, most of which were organized by the 16 networks with specific attention to the questions and topics of high interest and significance to network members and the membership at large. In addition, many sessions addressed topics highlighted by our affiliate partners in Washington as especially relevant to educators in that state.
The convention came together through the efforts of many individuals who brought tireless energy and enthusiasm to their work:
- The NAGC24 Host Committee was an invaluable partner to the NAGC team in organizing the entire event, including the energetic performances and beautiful artwork from local students. The Host Committee included members from three Washington affiliates for gifted education and gifted learners: WAETAG, the Washington Association of Educators of the Talented and Gifted; the Washington Coalition for Gifted Education; and the Northwest Gifted Child Association.
- A legion of volunteers in bright teal t-shirts, including local participants and other members and attendees from across the country, were constantly on hand to welcome attendees, answer questions, and complete a wide range of other tasks to ensure that the convention ran smoothly.
- Network leaders worked hard to construct a solid and engaging program and to facilitate special events and sessions. They and the SIG leaders provided a warm welcome to participants at the “Get to Know Your Networks and SIGs” event on Friday afternoon, and many networks held in-person network business meetings for the first time in several years.
- Exhibitors made the exhibit hall inviting and fun, sharing resources and conversations throughout the event. Many also served as sponsors, and they and other sponsors, together with NAGC’s generous donors, helped to make many of the features of the convention possible.
- Several hundred individuals participated as speakers, generously sharing their expertise to build a substantive, thought-provoking, and useful professional learning experience. Their sessions addressed topics from introductory learning about gifted education to advanced discussions of complicated and persistent issues in the field.
- The Convention Committee worked closely with the NAGC team all year to facilitate building a strong program, with an eye to continuous growth and innovation. Dozens of reviewers added their insights to program development, reviewing more than 800 proposals to make recommendations to the committee for the array of sessions to be offered.
- The NAGC staff team worked nonstop prior to and throughout the convention to ensure a high-quality and positive experience for participants. The small but mighty NAGC staff once again pulled off an inspiring and invigorating event for all who attended.
I invited members of the Convention Committee to share their reflections on the convention. Reby Parsley, WAETAG President and Convention Committee member, wrote, “As WAETAG president, I was thrilled to partner with NAGC for this year’s convention. It was an honor to showcase Washington’s progress in advancing equity in gifted education and demonstrate how our state is supporting all gifted learners. The opportunity to engage with national leaders and learn innovative practices directly from experts in the field was truly inspiring—not only for me but for countless educators who benefited from having NAGC right here in our home state.”
Another committee member, Matt Makel, commented that “seeing the incredible efforts individuals, schools, and states are making to meet the needs of their students is both inspiring and energizing. I love being reminded that I am a part of a vibrant community who gets things done.”
Vibrant community, commitment to equity, and inspiration from colleagues were themes throughout the event. At our opening session, we welcomed the large group of first-time attendees and also highlighted the history of our community, as we sought to discover who among those present had been coming to NAGC conventions the longest—finding members who had been attending since at least the 1970s! Shelagh Gallagher, President of the NAGC Board of Directors, reflected on our history as a community in her opening remarks, looking back and looking ahead at NAGC’s role in fostering equitable opportunities for talent development. She described key initiatives in progress and in preparation, including significant planned efforts to advocate for universal educator preparation in gifted education. A further celebration of our history came in a signature session called “Our Eras Tour: NAGC at 70,” in which a panel of leaders reflected on milestones across NAGC’s history and implications for the path to come.
The Lesson Roundtables were a new and popular feature of this year’s convention. At these two sessions, featuring more than 40 speakers, practitioners shared specific examples of the work they do in their classrooms with immediate take-away resources for participants. Dave Mendell, President of the Pennsylvania Association for Gifted Education and member of the Convention Committee, commented, “I really enjoyed both presenting at and attending the teacher roundtable sessions. It was a great way to share and pick up some great ideas that I can take back to my classroom!” WAETAG President Reby Parsley observed, “Attendees were highly engaged, sharing their enthusiasm for the practical, evidence-based strategies presented. Walking through the halls afterward, the positive feedback was overwhelming—educators loved leaving with tools they could implement on Monday.”
The keynote speakers who opened and closed the convention invited us into their stories and shared insightful reflections on the world that kids are experiencing today and how as educators and caregivers we can support their talent development and their growth as individuals and members of their communities. John Spencer, discussing “Vintage Innovation,” illustrated ways of enhancing students’ development of empathy and human connection even as they engage with ever more powerful technology. Kelly Yang explained how time to be bored and let her imagination work helped to make her into the successful writer she is today—and she encouraged all of us to model time away from our ubiquitous phones to foster that kind of opportunity.
From the special Sasquatch guest at the opening to the silent disco and giant Jenga game at Saturday’s party, the convention was a space for joy, laughter, and community. From the wide array of preconvention offerings to the network spotlight Super Sunday sessions, it was also a place for new learning, deep conversation, and attention to the challenges and opportunities of our times. Our gathering each year helps us grapple with the magnitude of our responsibilities to the children, educators, and caregivers we all serve—our responsibilities, and our opportunities. Kelly Yang’s words about the work of educators and caregivers really struck me as we concluded the convention: “You’re not just saving lives,” she said. “You are protecting humanity.”
Whatever you took from the convention, whether it was a specific strategy, a new question or understanding, or renewed energy for the work, I hope it provided space for reflection and inspiration. The Convention Committee is already hard at work planning for NAGC25 in Pittsburgh—I hope you will join us! Watch your NAGC communications for more details—the call for proposals opens December 13!
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Jeff Danielian,
Friday, December 13, 2024
Updated: Monday, December 9, 2024
|
In schools across the country, educators like myself are looking forward to the holiday break, which brings much-needed time and distance from the daily classroom’s activities. It will be a time for celebration, rest, and relaxation. It will also be a time for reflection. As you sit at home and ponder the New Year ahead, consider submitting a proposal for the NAGC 72nd Annual Convention (NAGC25), which will be held November 13-16, 2025 in Pittsburgh, PA.
Perhaps you have thought about submitting before or have already contemplated doing so this year. Maybe you are a bit apprehensive about doing it altogether. Let this be your motivation to submit a proposal to present at NAGC25!
I can clearly recall the first time I submitted, the first time my session was accepted, and the first time I presented at the NAGC convention. It was exhilarating! To stand before a group of students and teach is one thing, but nothing can prepare you for the excitement you feel standing in front of an audience of professional educators sharing curricular ideas and materials. Looking back on it now, I realize it was the catalyst for years of presentations to come.
As educators, we certainly have firsthand knowledge of student needs, what works and what doesn’t—All valuable information, activities, ideas, and lessons to share with an audience.
Educators make up the majority of the NAGC audience, and they are hungry for practical information that they can take back to their schools and apply immediately. Consider what learning activities you use. Think about those lessons that the students, administrators, and other faculty rave about. What are your methods? Have you been involved in developing a new program? Is there a unit of instruction you enjoy delivering? What are your favorite resources? These are just a few questions that can shape an excellent submission.
Have I persuaded you yet? If so, read on.
The first step is to visit and register on the submission site. It is easy to create an account. Simply scroll past the submission information (which you should read!) and click Join Now to begin. Once you are logged in, click Begin a New Proposal. There are now some items to fill out and some decisions to make. NAGC has 16 networks, and you will need to choose to which one you will submit your proposal. You can read about their specifics for submissions and see the State of Pennsylvania specific requests. NAGC also provides the scoring rubric reviewers will use. Note that the rubric has gone through an overhaul this year. In addition to seven questions relating to content and clarity, reviewers will also consider the proposal’s match to the selected the network, if there is a connection to one or more elements of the NAGC Strategic Plan, how well attended the session will be, and an overall rating.
The next step is to think of a title for your presentation, and honestly, try to be as creative as possible. Remember that your submission will be read by at least three reviewers, so pull them in right away. After submitting your presentation title, you will be taken to a page with 5 tasks to complete. Each task will ask you for specifics relating to your submission and will be annotated with a green checkmark when complete. Abstract Details is first. You will see your title displayed and then make a selection on the format of your presentation. There are details of each to help you decide. Following that you will be asked if you are willing to adapt your format preference, and if so, in what ways. This will help the selection committee in considering what would work best for the schedule. Next, you will comment on the level of knowledge presented and offer a 60-word short and 250-word extended description that describes your presentation. I suggest writing the 250-word description first and then edit that version to fit the 60-word description. Be concise and get to the point. Consider the objectives and goals you have for the session. Clicking continue will take you back to the Tasks Page.
Task 2 involves extended details for your presentation. You’ll be asked about your target audience(s), grade level(s), presentation style, session length preference, and possible connections to the NAGC Strategic Plan. Click continue and move on to the Learning Outcomes task, Task 3, where you will be asked to enter three Learning Outcomes. Consider what instructional strategies will you present and what you want the attendees to come away with? Will it be interactive? Will you provide materials? Continue on to the last 2 tasks, Proposal Presenters and Speaker Rules and Responsibilities. If you are the only presenter, simply edit your profile and click Save Presenter. If adding secondary presenters, fill in their name and email and Add Presenter. You can send an invite email to let them know they were added. Ideally, you should have already alerted your co-presenter(s) that you would be adding them. You will then complete the last task and agree to 5 items, clicking submit agreement when done.
When all of your tasks are complete, click Next and if you want to preview your submission, you can. The last step is to click Submit. There will be a green box indicating it has been submitted and you will receive a confirmation email. That is all you need to do. Users can submit up to 3 proposals for 2025.
Each moment spent in the classroom provides the opportunity to make a change in the lives of your students. Sharing what you do and what you know at an NAGC convention greatly expands your classroom beyond the four walls you are accustomed to. Your unique and creative ideas can spread far and wide. Plus, there are lots of other sessions for you to attend to enrich your own learning and teaching.
The time has come to be proud of what you have accomplished in the classroom and share it with others. Give it a shot! The NAGC25 Request for Proposals deadline is February 2, 2025, 3:00 PM PT. Make it your New Year’s resolution, and just do it!
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
|
|